Louis M. v O’Malley (S.D. Ga. Oct. 9, 2024) - AC evidence, medical opinions, RFC, DOT/VE conflict the court found such objective

the court found such objective evidence was present in this case

2) The ALJ’s mental RFC finding is deficient as it failed to address any limitations in interacting with supervisors

2020) (Decision by Rosemary S

the court found the ALJ failed to comply with SSR 12-2p which recognizes that “symptoms of [fibromyalgia] can wax and wane so that a person may have ‘bad days and good days’” and that the Ruling requires ALJs to “consider a longitudinal record whenever possible” when evaluating a disability claim based on fibromyalgia

Yet even under this deferential standard

Louis M. v O’Malley (S.D. Ga. Oct. 9, 2024) - AC evidence, medical opinions, RFC, DOT/VE conflict the court found such objectiveLouis M. v OMalley, Case No 4: 24 cv 00044 JRH CLR (S. D. Ga. Oct. 9, 2024) (Order by U. S. District Judge J. Randal Hall) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiffs Brief and remand order Topics addressed: New evidence submitted to the Appeals Council Definition of a medical source opinion Medical opinions required findings Medical opinions consistency Medical opinions supportability Medical opinions articulation requirements Improper substitution of medical