[Angela S.] v. O’Malley (D.N.J. Oct. 24, 2024) - medical opinions, RFC – reliance on ALJ’s lay interpretation of the record, sentence six new evidence remand Without some reasonable explanation from

Without some reasonable explanation from the ALJ as to why completing basic household chores is inconsistent with a finding of disability

Social Security Ruling 19-2p

Includes one case where the effectively hourly rate was $9

Yet any mention of Simon’s most serious symptoms is conspicuously missing from the ALJ’s decision

Briefs for purchase:  Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Supporting Memorandum of Law and Plaintiff’s Reply Brief

[Angela S.] v. O’Malley (D.N.J. Oct. 24, 2024) - medical opinions, RFC – reliance on ALJ’s lay interpretation of the record, sentence six new evidence remand Without some reasonable explanation from[Angela S.] v. OMalley, No. CV 23 22441 (RK), 2024 WL 4563910 (D. N. J. Oct. 24, 2024) (Decision by U. S. District Judge Robert Kirsch) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiffs Brief, Plaintiffs Reply Brief and court decision Topics addressed: Medical opinions supportability Medical opinions consistency Medical opinions articulation requirements RFC reliance on ALJs lay interpretation of the record Sentence six remands due to new evidence Ruling addressed: