Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $18.75 Learn more
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 13 - Aug 18
Medical opinions – supportability
Rulings addressed: none
Checklist of arguments to make in your cases
4) The ALJ’s finding that Plaintiff can return to his past relevant work as a security officer and security guard are not supported by substantial evidence
Past relevant work – as generally performed
I. A. v. O’Malley (D.N.J. Apr. 26, 2024) - mischaracterization of VE testimony, borderline age, RFC, medical opinion Medical opinions – supportabilityI. A. v. OMalley, Case No. 1: 23 20999 RBK (D. N. J. Apr. 26, 2024) (Order by U. S. District Judge Robert B. Kugler) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiffs Brief and remand order Topics addressed: RFC required findings RFC lack of support for findings Age categories mechanical application Vocational testimony mischaracterization of record Remand for an award of benefits delay Rulings addressed: Social Security Ruling 96 8p Social Security Ruling 96 9p Social
US$ 10.00
US$ 13.50
US$ 13.50
US$ 59.99
US$ 29.99
US$ 59.99
US$ 34.99
